You Might Like
Spread the love

[sg_popup id=97]

by Jeffrey M. Gresio:

Breaking: A secrete source (Who claims to be associated with White House inner circle) has reported the following: Files from a major news organization in order to defend itself once the FBI investigation was launched were turned over to the FBI to cover their ass.
● Report in order to cover themselves  received information from a Senator to push multiple stories but not all at once
● “We need these all spread out for maximum impact to delay his nomination and reclaim the seats needed to out last the administration”
● Reporter and news Corp granted immunity for turning this over and protecting themselves once the investigation was officially launched they panicked and never expected the president to agree

Enjoy the shit storm.  The allegations were staggered out to trigger public opinion calling for an FBI investigation when one was not needed because the senators receiving the allegations already knew they were fake/not credible. It was a coordinated smear campaign between 3 major news papers and a news network.

DF is done.
Tuesday morning NEWS CYCLE is going to be glorious.  The boss knows what he is doing.

A girl with a job putting her in the middle of this.

If the above information is true, this is going to be YUGE!!!  The DF referenced above of course is Diane Feinstein.

As many of you may or may not be aware, it has been recently reported that Diane Feinstiein has recently thrown one her staffers under the bus, as the individual who leaked Christine Blasey Ford’s letter to the press.  Between you and I, staffers on the left don’t do anything without marching orders.

If the above information turns out to be true, and it is also revealed that Diane Feinstein ultimately was responsible for the Ford Letter leak, she is toast, done, no more.  Disclosing confidential information during and from a confirmation hearing calls for automatic dismissal, regardless the status of the leaker.

Moving onto other news.  Christine Blasey Ford’s story continues to collapse.  Her whole story about during her sessions with her therapist and discussing between the therapist, her husband and herself about her wanting a second door added during a 2012 remodel appears bogus.

Pictures of the Ford home have surfaced showing the home in 2009 with 1 door and picture from early 2011 with two doors.  This means that the second front door was added before 2012.

Something I learned from a reader, which I am still trying to verify.  They stated that they had grown up in the same neighborhood as the Ford family, and that during the years in question 1980-84 the Safeway that Christine Blasey Ford referenced, saying her mother entered through one entrance and she through the other, only had one entrance in 1980-84.  The second entrance had been added later.  Many stores of that time and earlier had one entrance and a different exit point.

If anyone has further information on this would love to hear.

I also had another reader raise an excellent point.  It was stated by Christine Blasey Ford, that she didn’t know anything about how to contact a lawyer to represent her.  So she sat in her car making calls to lawyers, like from the yellow pages,  to local lawyers to find one to represent her.

Of course we have now learned Diane Feinstein’s office put her in contact with the Katz law firm.  But that aside, Christine Blasey Ford comes from a household of Lawyers.  Her Father was a lawyer, her brother Ralph Blasey III, is a lawyer other Brother Tom Blasey is a lawyer.  But she didn’t know any lawyers.

This is becoming more interesting as the whole Democratic Lefts story is crumbling, and Brett Kavanaugh’s statement that the sexual assault allegations were nothing more than a conspiracy to delay his nomination and revenge for Hitlery losing the 2016 election, are more and more appearing to look balls on accurate.

And for those of you who don’t know, from the Gateway Pundit: After a careful review of all of the evidence put fourth by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford in her accusations of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh, sex crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell has released a report which completely exonerates the judge.

Sex crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell, a non-partisan third-party with more than 25 years’ experience prosecuting sex crimes in the state of Arizona, carefully reviewed the allegations made by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, including hours of testimony, and has released a report on the matter. In the report, Mitchell points out more than a dozen glaring inconsistencies in Dr. Ford’s account and paints the accusations as potentially fraudulent.

Mitchell’s points out several points, including:

(1) “Dr. Ford has not offered a consistent account of when the alleged assault happened.”
(2) “Dr. Ford struggled to identify Judge Kavanaugh as the assailant by name.”
(3) “When speaking with her husband, Dr. Ford changed her description of the incident to become less specific.”
(4) “Dr. Ford has no memory of key details of the night in question—details that could help corroborate her account.”
(5) “She does not remember in what house the alleged assault took place or where that house was located with any specificity.”
(6) “Perhaps most importantly, she does not remember how she got from the party back to her house.”

Rachel Mitchell reaches the conclusion that ““A ‘he said, she said’ case is incredibly difficult to prove. But this case is even weaker than that.”

The more you know.  Enjoy the show.

Trust God and keep your powder dry.

Pray for our President and his administration.

God bless America and Patriots Worldwide.

#Covfefe #WWG1WGA #KAG

Jeffrey M. Gresio

Spread the love

Leave a Reply