Emily Ratajkowski came up with the brilliant idea to post a nude photo of herself to social media on Thursday to protest the Alabama Human Life Protection Act.
How much liberal logic did Supermodel Emily Ratajkowski expend to delude herself into thinking that posting a “Nude” picture of herself will benefit her cause?
Even more idiotic, Ratajkowski was specifically targeting the “25 old white men” who voted for the ban.
The stupidity of Emily Ratajkowski posting a “nude” photo of herself and thinking, ‘Yes, this will have all those ’25 old white men’ thinking ‘We must reevaluate our pro-life legislation,’ is simply mind-numbing.
The Alabama Human Life Protection Act was signed into law on Wednesday by Governor Kay Ivey (R-AL), a woman. The law totally outlaws abortion, save an exemption for the life of the mother, and targets third-party abortionists with life in prison for carrying out illegal abortions.
Fully triggered Ratajkowski posted the captioned “Our bodies, our choice,” photo of herself:
“This week, 25 old white men voted to ban abortion in Alabama even in cases of incest and rape.
These men in power are imposing their wills onto the bodies of women in order to uphold the patriarchy and perpetuate the industrial prison complex by preventing women of low economic opportunity the right to choose to not reproduce.
The states trying to ban abortion are the states that have the highest proportions of black women living there.
This is about class and race and is a direct attack on the fundamental human rights women in the US deserve and are protected by under Roe vs. Wade.”
While Ratajkowski is supposedly ‘nude’ in the photo, she’s not REALLY ‘nude,’ because her abortion outrage does have limits.
By strategically placing a flower petal between her legs, that covers up her crotch, and with her arm and hand covering her breasts, she basically posted what amounts to a Bikini photo.
Ratajkowski protest also did a faceplate because while trying to play the liberals much beloved ‘race card,’ she also unintentionally highlighted that black babies stand to gain the most from Alabama’s pro-life legislation.
Emily Ratajkowski’s Step On A Rake Protest
While we just pointed out Emily Ratajkowski’s imbecile face first photo caption, it wasn’t her only faceplant.
As Alyssa Milano did early this week with her “Sex strike,” Emily Ratajkowski also stepped on the very same rake with her post.
Alyssa Milano urged women to start a “Sex Strike,” supposedly she wanted women to forgo sex until they had recaptured their ‘Reproductive Rights’.
Of course, what Alyssa Milano did was show that abstinence is also a great way to end to the brutal murder of millions of innocent babies.
Milano tried not once, not twice, but three times to clarify her ‘Sex Strike” after she learned what she basically told women was their ability to change something resided within their sexuality.
Hooters and Honey Pots
It’s clearly evident that both Milano and Ratajkowski didn’t put much thought into their protests.
The dynamic duo of dimwits both posted what amounted to treating women as nothing more than ‘sex objects’ protests.
The two simpleminded social media morons basically told their gal pals that a woman’s power lies within their ability to use their ‘puppies’ and ‘kitty cat’ as leverage to get pet loving men into doing what women wanted.
That, of course, is the very same type of Neanderthal thinking that outrage liberals are supposed to get triggered over?