You Might Like
Spread the love

[sg_popup id=97]
A Michigan court-ordered audit of Dominion voting machines concluded that the systems are designed to perpetuate election fraud, supporting President Donald Trump’s claims of irregularities. State officials have criticized the report.

The court-ordered forensic audit, carried out by Allied Security Operations Group (ASOG), found that Dominion systems in Antrim County, Michigan recorded a shocking 68 percent error rate while tabulating votes. The report noted that the faulty software far exceeds the “allowable election error rate” of 0.0008 percent set by the Federal Election Commission.

Shockingly, the auditors claimed that the widespread errors were a feature, not a bug, stating that the voting system “intentionally” generates a high number of ballot errors which can then be used to manipulate the vote tally.

The preliminary report also found that there were attempts to “tamper with evidence.” Analysis revealed that on November 21, an “unauthorized user unsuccessfully attempted to zero out election results,” the auditors said. The report also found that all security logs from Election Day, and the days prior to and after November 3, had vanished.

The probe was conducted at the behest of Michigan’s 13th Circuit Judge Kevin Elsenheimer, as part of a case alleging that a widely reported incident in which thousands of votes that ‘flipped’ to Democrat Joe Biden in Antrim county was the result of more than just human error.

Elsenheimer released the audit’s findings on Monday after county officials withdrew their objections to the move.

Trump, who has repeatedly accused Dominion systems of tampering with the presidential election results, described the report as “BIG NEWS.”

“Dominion Voting Machines are a disaster all over the Country. Changed the results of a landslide election. Can’t let this happen. Thank you for the genius, bravery, and patriotism of the Judge. Should get a medal!” he wrote.

Michigan Democrats viewed the Dominion Voting Machines audit differently.

In a statement, Michigan’s Attorney General Dana Nessel and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson slammed the report as “another in a long stream of misguided, vague and dubious assertions designed to erode public confidence in the November presidential election.”

The officials also described ASOG, which has participated in other lawsuits challenging the election results, as “partisan,” and said the group lacks the expertise to audit the voting software.

Spread the love


  1. Are we to believe WI court case(s) that showed NO EVIDENCE of voter anomalies and were dismissed out of hand, or this smear piece that says the courts and judges were wrong? This on top of Republican claims to have appointed so many judges of right-leaning persuasion. I’ll believe the courts, not this smear piece in a state the Republicans want to believe is STILL on their side for Electoral College voting in 2020 like 2016.
    I’ll go with the stacked courts every time when reason, facts, precedence and the law all align against claims of voter fraud that remain unproven today.

  2. Why doesn’t Facebook ad in bold red lettering that the Democratic claims “are disputed,” like they added to the forensic report ????

Leave a Reply